The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do not believe that carbohydrates in and of themselves are harmful to humans now I'll qualify that statement as I do in the book by saying that processed carbohydrates are good for no one and that grain based carbohydrates are probably not good for anyone but there are many cultures throughout the world who eat carbohydrates and and demonstrate really pretty pretty good metabolic health so I struggle with arguments that carbohydrates in and of themselves are bad
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
don't lump carbohydrates into the processed sugar thing because they're not the same right there's probably a worsening with high fructose corns here because you can over consume it but do not lump carbohydrates in there because that's a mistake and there are a lot of people that we've talked about that we will talk about i'll probably do a little extra after this podcast after chris has to leave i've talked about the toca lounge and the tukacinta and the maasai a lot of these cultures consume carbohydrates without any problems