The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when they leave these carcasses on the savannah these animals that are biologically equipped to go in and scavenge things like the ancestors to modern day hyenas and buzzards will go in rip off flesh and and do their thing the problem was our ancestors were not biologically equipped to join that party
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we we find the tool and we know for sure they're cutting hacking on bones again they're not hunting right there they're scavenging the kills that were made by predators