We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and then you'd have a monoculture so it creates this ripe opportunity for insects to come in if you're an insect that does nothing but eat cotton or eat peanuts or eat soy 900 000 acres of of of corn is a really good looking buffet for you right and so you have these plagues of pests that can come so now you got to play spray pesticides because there's no natural you know um you know counter balancing forces or checks and balances and stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
mono crops are really susceptible to pest invasions to um insect invasions fungus you know and we can see this with the banana industry for example there's been huge diseases that have completely wiped out bananas and then we just go find a new braided banana plant to and wait for that to get invaded with another disease and so you need tons of chemical inputs in order to keep a mono crop healthy