The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Peter you made the example that you were maintaining your body weight on 4,400 calories a day and and by the way for the listener wondering I was training a heck of a lot more than I train now that's when I was I mean truthfully probably exercising three hours a day
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when i was cycling a lot which is the last thing that i did kind of quasi seriously um i mean i was easily consuming 600 calories of sorry 600 grams of carbohydrates a day and i mean no issues maintaining normal glucose homeostasis if today i were to consume 600 grams of carbohydrates a day and just put that in perspective that's 2400 calories of carbs a day okay like that's that's about what the average person is eating in total intake per day um but if i were to consume 2 400 calories of carbohydrates today i don't suspect my glucose would look nearly as good as it did then and that's because you know i used to be exercising nearly 28 hours a week and now i'm exercising maybe 10 hours a week
Now if I ate that much food today never mind sugar I mean you wouldn't even know my name anymore I'd be dead