The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
an energy balance probably plays a greater role in glucose homeostasis then from a nutrition standpoint then the individual constituents of the meal — now that's not entirely true like I can imagine a scenario where a person could be in a negative energy balance eating Twix bars all day and drinking you know big gulps but I also don't think that's a very sustainable thing to do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.