The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If, for example, when you're making a salad, you prefer the taste of safflower oil or canola oil over olive oil. Doesn't seem like you're killing yourself by doing it based on the data. Um, and you probably don't need to go to restaurants that are adamant that they exclude seed oils because if it's a good restaurant, whether it uses seed oils or not, it's probably using good ingredients otherwise and you're probably going to be just fine.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.