The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when we are eating animals nose to tail it really appears that humans can get every single nutrients every single vitamin mineral that we need to thrive and the common question is what about vitamin C and the interesting response is that there is vitamin C and animal foods as you suggest if the animal foods are fresh
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
vitamin C is the only exception to that I can talk about vitamin C later in this podcast but generally speaking with vitamin C I think that there is good evidence that doses beyond 70 50 70 milligrams are not beneficial for humans and we can easily obtain 50 to 70 milligrams of vitamin C eating animal foods nose-to-tail