The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and i feel like with the body if something agrees with you you just kind of know it and if it doesn't agree with you kind of like think about like times in the past where i would have had you know gluten or something like that and then like or like rice flour always did it to me like it's like within 20 minutes you're like oh i ate something like that's not a lot of time even 10 minutes sometimes so you kind of just know
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.