The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you actually look at people in Loma Linda so these same sort of vegetarians and the seventh-day Adventist study if you look at those people and you look at their sperm quality you can see that their sperm quality is very low
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what they found in the males in loma linda which is a primarily vegan and vegetarian community which is seventh-day adventist was that the males who were vegan and vegetarian had much worse sperm counts and much worse sperm motility than the males who were eating meat and omnivores