The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and if you look at their BMR you actually get a reduction in BMR above what you would expect based on the loss of lean tissue and fat tissue because fat tissue is real somewhat metabolically active there's actually up to like on average a 15% reduction in BMR
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we know if you diet lose like 10% of your body weight it can decrease your BMR we call that metabolic adaptation outside of what you would expect just based on the amount of mass you lose so it's about on average like 15% decline in BMR but 10% weight loss can also induce a 4 to 500 calorie decrease in neat per day