The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so 30% loss of copper is eight times the impact of a fever so 30% loss of copper is eight times the impact of a fever right that's a 4% difference IAL and you know how bad you feel when you have a fever so 30% loss of copper is eight times the impact of a fever and people don't realize the reach of copper and the copper enzymes that regulate our body
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.