Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
I think that it's less likely that it's a wash. I think it's less likely that we're walking a tightrope, a slackline among no benefit, no harm with these vegetables. I think it's likely they are either beneficial or harmful.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
many plant defense chemicals very few of which have been tested in animal studies and we don't really know about humans there are some studies in humans that I can reference in this podcast looking at cell culture and looking at a process called clastogenesis whereby these chemicals may break DNA in cell culture whether that translates into real life for humans is unknown many of these things are difficult to study but there have been some small forays into actually studying these compounds but a lot of them are unknown