The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I try to aim for is repairing someone's gut so they can eat as broad as possible, giving them that opportunity and encouraging them probably to yes, try to eat as broadly as possible just as a general hedge and also convenience factor. But if someone can't get to the point where they're able to do that, if they've gone through all the the healing therapies for the gut, then I don't I don't force them into eating food that we think should make you healthier.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.