The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and in fact some anthropologist have gone so far as to suggest that we were primarily carnivorous because of the amount of these isotopes in our bones and in the bones of our contemporary Neanderthal ancestors or Neanderthal relatives we can talk about that in a moment we're so high that they were higher than known carnivores like hyenas
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.