The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but all in measurements and when the time is right because uh if you don't um if you restrict too much and you don't touch chocolate for a month or for 6 months then one time you will break and you will go crazy know and uh I think that's not good relationship with food so you need to have a balance also with with the bad food also no
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that's not good relationship with food so you need to have a balance also with with the bad food also no