The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
no matter you look at all these populations and paul and i go through the others someday the the ashay the the the of paraguay the um uh yeah the hot yeah i want to mention the hadza the chimney yeah yeah the tamane of bolivia all of these here's what you find and and is that well they're not consuming any processed foods no refined flour sugars or vegetable oils no processed foods right it always comes back to this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.