The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think they munched on the entirety of it uh and that changes the macro composition of it substantially changes the nutritional value of it substantially and I think I think definitely all of our ancestors always ate Tacoma and the larvae I don't think they just drained off the honey
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they definitely ate the comb and The larva which I think our ancestors always did that yeah just to drain off the honey I think that never happened I think they munched on the entirety of it
I think they munched on the entirety of it uh and that changes the macro composition of it substantially changes the nutritional value of it substantially and I think I think definitely all of our ancestors always ate Tacoma and the Lord but I don't think they just drained off the honey