The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but i think as you have suggested as mickey vendors suggested and many others have suggested that we were hunting the fattiest animals and who knows what macros we were getting and i think we're still trying to figure out where the protein the fat macro is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
currently living hunter-gatherers are not always the best estimation of the macronutrient ratios of our historical predecessors