The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you are eating most of your fat from animals which is where we would have gotten it and again you know I'm not staunchly dogmatically against carbohydrates but I think we would have gotten the majority of our fat from animals wild animals don't have a lot of omega-6 floating around in their body it's mostly saturated and some and you know half mono and half saturated with a small amount of PUFA
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the best way to do that is to get these you know get the omega-6 as low as you possibly can and you will do that with animal fats that are pot that are uh traditionally raised on pasture on grass 100 grass fed is the way to get there