The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if you're powered only by fat and you're eating a lot of fat and that's coming in as a lot of chylomicrons i would bet that you're not going to have a lot of vldls released by your body over time it's gonna say oh we we don't need to we're already in a state of abundance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
since fat doesn't it goes nuttin have any effect on vld or LDL just travels
if you eat lots of fat your body is getting all the cholesterol and fat that it needs from the chylomicrons so the body doesn't need to make VLDL because it doesn't have any need to take fat and cholesterol out of the liver or especially fat out of the liver so the LDL note level actually rises up slightly because the liver says I've got enough of you they don't need any more of this at the moment so I'm not going to absorb it