Paul Saladino· MD
Are you eating a "species-appropriate" human diet that is giving your body the correct signals? Or are you creating issues by ingesting kilogram quantities of food molecules that give the wrong signals?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Are you eating a "species-appropriate" human diet that is giving your body the correct signals? Or are you creating issues by ingesting kilogram quantities of food molecules that give the wrong signals?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think there is a species-appropriate diet for humans i think there are good and bad foods and that is why i do what i do because i want to understand from a medical perspective from a biochemical perspective what the good and bad foods are for humans what are the foods that allow us to thrive and what are the foods that make us ill
everything works when we get the right nutrients everything works when we eat a species-appropriate diet and everything falls apart when we don't