The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What about the saturated the high saturated fat and the trans fat? They were the worst. >> Yeah. >> And and what were the outcomes? >> Oh, uh CBD type outcomes? >> So biomarkers obviously >> with the exception I think of triglycerides. My recollection is you know the the traditional trans fat sat fat were worse. I think the lowfat high carb was worse for triglycerides and the highfat corn oil type stuff was better for everything.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And the idea was is lowfat better than corn oil? And the answer was no. Um, you know, assuming you can control your calories, you're better off eating the full fat corn oil chips.