The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And I just am not convinced that's the case. When I was with the Hadza, they were eating honey without abandon. Like just just with reckless abandon. It's not even reckless because it's good for them. But they were eating honey when we could find it. And they they're sure their blood sugar went up above 130 when they did that. And mine did too because I ate honey right out of the comb.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.