The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they eat the organs with us man they eat the meat with us and i mean stryker loves his sweet potatoes he loves his carbs but uh they they eat that stuff they eat the meat first they know they have to eat that stuff first like they're they're into it and uh they're clearly benefiting it's so cool to see them you know really coming into their own and thriving
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i've seen your boys and they eat with us man they eat the organs with us they eat the meat with us and i mean stryker loves his sweet potatoes he loves his carbs but uh they they eat that stuff they eat the meat first they know they have to eat that stuff first like they're they're into it and uh they're clearly benefiting it's so cool to see them you know really coming into their own and thriving
and i've seen your boys and they eat with us man they eat the organs with us they eat the meat with us and i mean stryker loves his sweet potatoes he loves his carbs but uh they they eat that stuff they eat the meat first they know they have to eat that stuff first like they're they're into it and uh they're clearly benefiting it's so cool to see them you know really coming into their own and thriving