We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i really go how much does that actually mean yeah i think this stuff means absolutely nothing i i think that you know when you think about the time course of something and you tell me that you measured somebody's igf-1 or igf-6 an hour after a meal and in two hours i i yeah i agree with you completely it's totally nonsense
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i really go how much does that actually mean yeah i think this stuff means absolutely nothing i i think that you know when you think about the time course of something and you tell me that you measured somebody's igf-1 or igf-6 an hour after a meal and in two hours yeah i agree with you completely it's totally nonsense