The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But I think of exogenous ketones are calorie-containing molecules that are essentially in some ways found in nature, some of them are, some of them aren't. But they do elevate a bioidentical ketone bodies in the blood and in tissues.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Um, and this is where exogenous ketones, I think, become so helpful. Where if you have someone who just says, "I just don't want to do the ketogenic diet, but I still would like some of the benefits." Um, there are so many good options nowadays that I think I think it becomes a viable approach for someone to say, "I want the ketones, but I want I don't want ketogenic, so I'm just going to drink them."