The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so it took a long time for the U.S. dietary guidelines to catch up, and I was really in a bind because there was this historical precedent of limiting dietary cholesterol because of its potential role in blood cholesterol levels.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And then 15 years later, the current dietary guidelines come out saying, "After all these years of recommending keeping cholesterol less than 300 milligrams per day, we realized that we no had data to support that."