The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in people who had more linoleic acid in their fatty tissue which is a good indicator of linoleic acid consumption so this is not the same type of observational study where they are asking people what they eat they're actually sampling the linoleic acid in the fatty tissue they see a clear correlation with increased melanoma in people who have more linoleic acid in the fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
eating more linoleic acid is associated with worse melanoma in these people
in people who had more linoleic acid in their fatty tissue which is a good indicator of linoleic acid consumption... they see a clear correlation with increased melanoma in people