Paul Saladino· MD
by avoiding plants or limiting plants we get so many of the so many less of the plant toxins
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
by avoiding plants or limiting plants we get so many of the so many less of the plant toxins
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I do think that elimination of plant toxins is important for the reason some of the reasons I mentioned
I do think plants exist on a spectrum of toxicity and there probably are of some plants that most people can eat it's not the plants that we think of is traditionally healthy
the plants that we're eating exist on a spectrum of toxicity this is commonly known throughout indigenous cultures and hunter-gatherers they don't all eat plants without some consideration of what plant they're eating or which part of the plant they're eating and when they eat parts of plants that are toxic they often go to great lengths to detoxify these so plants exist in a toxicity spectrum if you are not thriving understanding this and eliminating the most toxic plants the most toxic parts of plants will probably result in much greater health whether that's improvements in skin gi libido mood body composition or other autoimmune issues
and how do we create then um an idea of a framework of a diet for humans that also includes a very clear message that the exclusion of many of these foods specifically what i might consider to be the most toxic plants can be very helpful for people who are continuing to suffer