We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I'm amazed at how resistant the oncologists are on average obviously there were exceptions but on average to interfering with nutrition because in many ways their primary concern tragically is preserving weight and so I always get a little verklempt when I walk through an oncology ward and I see patients drinking in Shore I couldn't think of a worse thing you'd want to consume when you have cancer and yet the goal is hey we got to fatten these people up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.