Paul Saladino· MD
or at least that's the hypothesis that I would pause it and I think it had to do with the fact that our brains got so much bigger because we started eating animals
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
or at least that's the hypothesis that I would pause it and I think it had to do with the fact that our brains got so much bigger because we started eating animals
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and because we suddenly got access we probably got smart enough and strong enough big enough and developed shoulders that were agile enough to actually hunt animals when we did that we allowed our brains to grow because of this large amount of nutrients and then when we don't need the plants anymore I think that we lose the ability to eat them in such a way that we had before and we kind of lose our adaptations