The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the worst case for MTHFR is the c6 70 70 homozygous homozygous a or homozygous 440 instead of yeah yeah yeah so it's the TT and then on the a one two nine eight C it's like yeah for the a12 98 see that one is less significant than the c6 seventy seventy but you can have both of them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.