The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if i show you here's cholesterol and here's what's in this plan you would think you're showing me a lot of cholesterol but if you look closely you'd see that tail that's coming out of carbon 17 it's constructed a little differently or wait a minute if there's another double bond in one of those rings in there so it looks like cholesterol but it's close but it's really not
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.