We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
to say that sugar in all of his forms is the main problem i think draws too broad a sweep true brought a swath it's not fine enough to say that now i'm not saying high fructose corn syrup is good it's replacing other nutrient dense foods like you know fat soluble vitamins containing animal fats but to say that sugar is causing this is i think we can't say that for sure and i don't think we should fear fructose in reasonable amounts
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.