We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I I just I'm not convinced that that that humans are really meant to thrive on a plant-based diet ever at all and that were again we're looking at snapshots of people who can subsist for some short amount of time with massive amounts of supplementation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
personally I'm quite skeptical that that humans can thrive on plant-based diets long term when I did a podcast with Chris master John and and you've said this as well Chris brought up this really great point that that we really need to be careful when we're saying plant-based does that mean you're getting 2% of your foods from animals because as you and both Chris master John have pointed out if you get 2% of your foods from animals and that's boy stirs and liver that's a very unique subset of nutrients