The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other cool thing about regenerative agriculture is that they put multiple species on the same plot what's cool about this is it interrupts parasite life cycles just like would have happened evolutionarily from an ecosystems perspective
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is a worm that affects sheep called a barber pole worm and a worm that affects cows called a brown stomach worm when you put the two animals together the life cycle of those parasites is interrupted they don't go infect the other animal and neither animal is affected by the parasite because if we're just putting one species on a spot of land then that worm can do its lifecycle like it wants to but if you put a second species they're like sheep they're not infected by the
when you put the two animals together the life cycle of those parasites is interrupted they don't go infect the other animal and neither animal is affected by the parasite