The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well both sugar and refined wheat they're both nutrient deficient foods so now you're taking you're just taking up more and more of your diet with foods that don't have vitamins and minerals and you have to get all these vitamins and minerals and when you are missing any of those your physiology begins to go around and things begin to degenerate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.