We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
EBM doesn't stand for evidence-based medicine it stands for eminence based medicine and so the oldest guys with the most gray hair and the longest white coats they get in the room and they decide this is what we're gonna recommend and then that becomes part of the guidelines there's no evidence backing that up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.