The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is a dose-dependent effect and so I think the argument that Trevor addmarker making is that it's very difficult to get dosages that are physiologically meaningful so I I've spoken at conferences with Lustig and those folks and Jenny brand Miller who is Miss glycemic index she's a colleague so my feeling is that you know fruit for the most part unless you're you know completely blasting on high sugar fruit like Greeks or something is not problematic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.