Paul Saladino· MD
there's actually not consistent evidence that saturated fats are even negative for human endothelial function
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's actually not consistent evidence that saturated fats are even negative for human endothelial function
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at the literature more deeply for saturated fats or animal fats and humans you find that there's really not consistent evidence that animal fats will lower flow mediated dation in humans