The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even absent something like celiac disease there's clearly an intolerance to wheat on the part of many people and it only shows up in uh a biochemical assay that that surveys for for uh inflammation such as a a c reactive protein um or a slight change in the white blood cell count or things of that nature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we certainly see that outside of very extreme examples where uh you know for example celiac disease is a pretty extreme and specific case but even absent something like celiac disease there's clearly an intolerance to wheat on the part of many people and it only shows up in uh a biochemical assay that that surveys for for uh inflammation such as a a