The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the calorie is just a measure of how much energy it takes to like raise a certain amount of water by a temp it's just a stup it's not even a real thing and but like the amount of quote energy that someone gets out of a food can never be represented on the side of a bag or even you know in the USDA they can look at a steak and say oh it has this many calories that's really not true like it assumes that your biochemical Machinery works
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and if it doesn't all calories are not created equally and it's not just about eating too much it's that you're not actually using it
the amount of quote energy that someone gets out of a food can never be represented on the side of a bag or even you know in the USDA they can look at a steak and say oh it has this many calories that's really not true like it assumes that your biochemical Machinery works and if it doesn't all calories are not created equally