The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
from seven to 2 or 3% is exponentially more difficult that that'll take you how many weeks uh probably 12 to 16 to go for those from 7 to two um you know because again it's not just losing the weight it's also maintain the lean mass too maintaining the lean mass as a drug-free athlete is extremely difficult
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if they want to do a show is 12 weeks is not going to do it if you're drug free unless you're already extremely lean
from seven to to three or two which is an absolute lower amount of fat loss was infinitely more difficult it's like — the best way to describe it is like kind of like you get a fresh roll of toothpaste to get out some tooth P very easy then as that toothpaste tube gets you know emptier and emptier how much effort do you have to put in to just squeeze out that last little bit of toothpaste