The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and i can't tell you how many times we would put some bone broth with some liver inside of it maybe maybe uh um there's a few other things in the bone broth and they wouldn't touch it and it's like okay guess what you're seeing that for the next meal and the next meal and so sure over a couple of days i mean they were they were starving and then they would have a bite and they loved it you know
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and now they think it's the best it's the best thing ever you know and now i think if you put liver in front of them they they want to say they love it they don't dislike it it's just that they know that liver and bone marrow comes first they know that nose-to-tail stuff comes first and then they get to eat some more stuff that they really enjoy