The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
which sort of establishes one of the important things about hne is that it's toxic it's a toxin I mean that's not my opinion that's what how it's listed everywhere you'll ever read it right um in large amounts this is a toxin it it also Alters how your body you know or if you're a yeast cell your cell processes energy and it predisposes you to storing fat right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so a continuous supply of hne which you would only get in a lab or if you're eating the modern American diet is going to predispose your body to constantly storing fat right
and they've note they've discovered in these animal models that when you stop the flow of hne this process stops