The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they took the blood from these people after two hours so they're looking at what's called postprandial hypertriglyceridemia they didn't actually measure triglycerides they were just looking visually at the serum which is what you get when you spin the blood down and as you're throwing as you're suggesting when the guys ate the burrito with meat and cheese it was cloudy there was more there were more triglycerides in the blood
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.