The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I've seen that in people when I see the plant sterols moderately elevated or at least in the middle of the range or even some people are hyper absorbers it's usually from coffee because a lot of people I work with don't have a lot of plants but some people do but it's something to notice especially as we get to have more research about the fact that they may be atherogenic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.