The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Those studies are ongoing now. Jethro Hugh at UCLA just published a study uh at UCLA just showing you know improve metrics of survival and you know uh increased quality of life and different and I didn't get a chance to it just came out a paper just came out so that research is ongoing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Durable? No, it's not going to cure it. So, we're talking about the standard of care does nothing. We're talking about >> life extension. >> Yeah. We're talking about doubling survival, like tripling.
A dietary approach can then potentially make the existing drugs work or augment the many different factors that could make the brain cancer more responsive to the tumor.