The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
just going back to World War II there was a good actually intentions in having big subsidies for these stable crops like soybeans um you know to feed the world the Marshall Plan to have shelf stable food the industries got so big and these lobbies got so big that they've really taken advantage of that and kept this thing in place to where now our diet is primarily seed oils
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
90% of all subsidies are going to Corn soy wheat uh the foundations of alter processed food and Seed oils