The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the questions are complicated enough that the difference between efficacy and Effectiveness have to be separated in studies and I I think if this question of macronutrient composition isocaloric macronutrient manipulation impacting energy expenditure is to be put to rest it it it can only answer that question it cannot attempt to answer the impact of appetite
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.